ፍለጋ የጣቢያ ፍለጋ

ኮለር ከ 1.4 ሚሊዮን ዶላር በላይ ጉዳት ለደረሰበት በጣም የታወቀ ስማርት የመታጠቢያ ቤት ኩባንያ ወሰደ

በዓይነቱ መመደብጦማር 976 0

የመታጠቢያ ቤት ቢዝነስ ትምህርት ቤት

በቅርቡ ፣ ኮህለር (ቻይና) ኢንቬስትሜንት ኩባንያ Zጂያንያን ዌይዌይ እና ሌሎች ብዙ ኢንተርፕራይዞች የመጀመሪያ ደረጃ ላይ የባለቤትነት መብት ጥሰት ጉዳይ ብቅ ሲሉ ለኮህለር ደግፈዋል ፡፡

እ.ኤ.አ. በ 2017 ኮህለር (ቻይና) ኢንቬስትሜንት ኃ.የተ.የግ.የዝጂያንግ ዌይዌይ የኤሌክትሮኒክስ ሳኒቴር ዌር ኩባንያ ኃ.የተ.የግ. እና የሻንጋይ ዌይዌይ የኤሌክትሮኒክስ ሳኒቴር ዌር ኩባንያ ኃላፊ እና የታይዙ ጁጂያ ቴክኖሎጂ ኩባንያ እና ቤጂንግ ጂንግዶንግ ሳንሊቱ ኢ-ኮሜርስ ኃ.የተ.የ. የዲዛይን የፈጠራ ባለቤትነት መብቶችን ለመጣስ ፡፡

The trial was held in public on September 10, 2019, at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. Kohler said in the lawsuit, Zhejiang Weiwei, Shanghai Weiwei without the plaintiff’s permission, jointly manufacture, sell, promise to sell the model V9-B, V9-C toilet infringed Kohler is still in the patent protection period of ZL201330193853.8, the name of the “toilet” design patent, Jingdong for the above-mentioned The conduct provides an e-commerce platform, and IKEA’s sale and promise to sell V9-B toilets and promise to sell V9-C toilets without the plaintiff’s permission also constitutes an infringement of the patent.

ኮህለር ዝዋይያን ዌይዌይ እና ሻንጋይ ዌይዌይ ማምረት ፣ መሸጥ ፣ ጥሰቱን የሚሸጡ ምርቶችን ለመሸጥ ቃል በመግባት በአፋጣኝ እንዲያቆሙ ለፍርድ ቤቱ ትዕዛዝ እንዲሰጥ የጠየቁ ሲሆን የጥሰቱን ምርቶች ለማምረት ደግሞ ሁሉንም ጥሰት ምርቶች እና አግባብነት ያላቸውን ሻጋታዎች ያጠፉ ፡፡ በተመሳሳይ ጊዜ ከዌይዌይ ከ 200 በላይ ሱቆችም እንዲሁ ጥሰት ምርቶችን ሸጡ ፣ ስለዚህ የኢኮኖሚ ኪሳራ እና ምክንያታዊ ሙግት በድምሩ 14,208,850 ዩዋን ፣ of which a total of 420,850 yuan of reasonable litigation expenses, including 400,000 yuan of lawyer’s fees, notary fees 20,850 yuan. In addition, Ikea was ordered to pay 620850 yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses, including 420,850 yuan for reasonable expenses, including 400,000 yuan for attorney’s fees and 20850 yuan for notary fees.

Zhejiang Weiwei, Shanghai Weiwei pointed out in the defense, the infringing products and the patent in question, neither the same nor similar, not into the scope of protection of the patent in question, even if the infringing products fall into the scope of protection of the patent in question, the plaintiff claim amount is too high, request the court to reject all the plaintiff’s claim.

IKEA argued that it agreed with the defense of Zhejiang Weiwei and Shanghai Weiwei, and said that the infringing products sold by IKEA have legal sources, should not bear the liability, accordingly, request the court to reject all the plaintiff’s claims.

ከችሎቱ በኋላ የቤጂንግ የአዕምሯዊ ንብረት ፍ / ቤት የባለቤትነት መብቱ አሁንም በሚሰራበት ጊዜ መሆኑን እና ጥሰቶቹ ምርቶች እና ጥሰት ምርቶች ብዙ መመሳሰሎች በመታየታቸው በፍርድ ቤቱ ችሎት ውስጥ heጂያንግ ዌይዌ ፣ ሻንጋይ ዌይዌ ማምረቻውን ተግባራዊ ማድረጉን አምነዋል ፡፡ ፣ ሽያጭ ፣ የጣሰውን ምርቶች ለመሸጥ ቃል በመግባት ፣ በኮህለር የተደሰቱትን የባለቤትነት መብቶች ጥሰት የሚያደርግ ተዛማጅ የፍትሐብሔር ግዴታን ይወስዳል ፡፡ አይኬኤ የግለሰባዊ ስህተት አልነበረውም ፣ እናም ኃላፊነቱን መሸከም አያስፈልገውም ፡፡

The court of first instance ordered Zhejiang Weiwei and Shanghai Weiwei to immediately stop manufacturing, selling and promising to sell the infringing products, and Taizhou Ikea to immediately stop selling and promising to sell the infringing products, and rejected Kohler’s request to destroy all the infringing products and related molds. At the same time ordered Zhejiang Weiwei, Shanghai Weiwei compensation for the plaintiff Kohler (China) Investment Company Limited economic losses of 200,000 yuan, 60,850 yuan in litigation costs. And pay 1400 yuan for case acceptance fee.

ቀዳሚ :: ቀጣይ:
መልስ ለመሰረዝ ጠቅ ያድርጉ
    展开 更多ሺ更多更多更多
    ወደ WOWOW FAUCET ኦፊሴላዊ ድር ጣቢያ እንኳን በደህና መጡ

    በመጫን ላይ ...

    ምንዛሬዎን ይምረጡ
    ዩኤስዶላርዩናይትድ ስቴትስ (አሜሪካ) ዶላር

    ጋሪ

    X

    የአሰሳ ታሪክ

    X